When .NET introduced LINQ and lambdas, I was blown away by the efficiency improvements in writing code. But, after reading countless articles online about how horribly slow and inefficient LINQ (even to objects) was compared with just plain for-loops, I’ve always felt guilty about using it.
The other day, however, I wanted to see how much slower linq would be in comparing 2 lists of objects to find all of the items from list1 that were not in list2. LINQ has an extension method called “Except” just for this.
I coded the solution in LINQ, and then coded a few “solutions” using pre-LINQ techniques…spoiler alert: LINQ was the best for large sets of objects.